db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel John Debrunner <...@debrunners.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-496) unit test 'org.apache.derbyTesting.unitTests.services.T_Diagnosticable' was failed
Date Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:10:16 GMT
Tomohito Nakayama (JIRA) wrote:
>     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-496?page=comments#action_12320680 ]

> 
> Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-496:
> -----------------------------------------
> 
> Description of DERBY-496_2_addition.patch:
> 
> Modification:
> * Adding DiagnosticUtil explicitly to derby.jar by modifying extraDBMSclasses.properties
> 
> Testing:
> * unit/T_Diagnosticable passed.

Not sure I agree with this change. Adding code into the product
(derby.jar) *only* in order to make a unit test pass seems a generally
incorrect approach.

I think that maybe the Diagnosticable interface should be removed. I
think the functionality it is trying to provide is really the domain of
a Java debugger. The classes & mechanism were there to provide access to
non-public fields of classes for debugging, but its approach requires
security compromises to be made, by making such private or non-public
fields accessible.

Dan.


Mime
View raw message