db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Van Couvering <David.Vancouver...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Partial patch of i18n work
Date Sat, 27 Aug 2005 03:55:14 GMT
OK, working on it, should have a patch attached to the bug by Monday 
morning.

David

Satheesh Bandaram wrote:

>Hi David,
>
>Thanks for taking time to address this... Yes, I think this is a good
>idea. As long as your patch doesn't break any existing functionality and
>correctly update affected tests, I think partial checks are good.
>
>Satheesh
>
>David Van Couvering wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Hi, all. I am thinking it would be beneficial to provide a partial
>>patch of the network client i18n be submitted to the codeline.  This
>>would be the general framework and about 100 converted messages.
>>
>>I am worried that if I wait until it's all done, it's a lot of
>>messages, and the reviewer would have a hard time working through it
>>all.  The other advantage is that reviewers can catch any issues
>>before I convert the all of the messages, potentially saving me a lot
>>of time.  The observed behavior change for the user would be the
>>following:
>>
>>- Some percentage of exceptions will have valid SQL states rather than
>>null SQL staes
>>- Some messages have changed slightly (some of them were worded pretty
>>"sparsely", like "Driver not capable")
>>- There is a new default error code for network client exceptions that
>>is more in line with the error codes coming from the server
>>
>>Would a partial checkin of the i18n be acceptable, or does someone
>>have a strong objection to this?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>David
>>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>

Mime
View raw message