db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Satheesh Bandaram <sathe...@Sourcery.Org>
Subject Re: Partial patch of i18n work
Date Fri, 26 Aug 2005 23:36:59 GMT
Hi David,

Thanks for taking time to address this... Yes, I think this is a good
idea. As long as your patch doesn't break any existing functionality and
correctly update affected tests, I think partial checks are good.

Satheesh

David Van Couvering wrote:

> Hi, all. I am thinking it would be beneficial to provide a partial
> patch of the network client i18n be submitted to the codeline.  This
> would be the general framework and about 100 converted messages.
>
> I am worried that if I wait until it's all done, it's a lot of
> messages, and the reviewer would have a hard time working through it
> all.  The other advantage is that reviewers can catch any issues
> before I convert the all of the messages, potentially saving me a lot
> of time.  The observed behavior change for the user would be the
> following:
>
> - Some percentage of exceptions will have valid SQL states rather than
> null SQL staes
> - Some messages have changed slightly (some of them were worded pretty
> "sparsely", like "Driver not capable")
> - There is a new default error code for network client exceptions that
> is more in line with the error codes coming from the server
>
> Would a partial checkin of the i18n be acceptable, or does someone
> have a strong objection to this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>


Mime
View raw message