db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Van Couvering <David.Vancouver...@Sun.COM>
Subject Re: Size of common jar file
Date Tue, 26 Jul 2005 21:51:00 GMT
Hi, Dan.  As much as I don't want to let go of this because I think it's 
important and we'll need to deal with it, I agree with you that doing 
this with new functionality is probably more sane than trying to make it 
work with existing functionality.


Daniel John Debrunner wrote:

>David Van Couvering wrote:
>[lots of good stuff about code sharing]
>Maybe a better approach would be to start code sharing with a new
>feature, such as JMX support, and set a pattern using that. Then if
>required the old code could be de-tangled and fitted to the new scheme.
>This might be a cleaner and happier approach, evolution not revolution.
>Then we get a good example, working code sharing, a new feature (e.g.
>JMX) and with the least amount of work.

View raw message