db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sunitha Kambhampati (JIRA)" <derby-...@db.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-465) Embedded Derby-PointBase comparison
Date Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:22:49 GMT
    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-465?page=comments#action_12316126 ] 

Sunitha Kambhampati commented on DERBY-465:
-------------------------------------------

I am posting the comment that Mike Matrigali posted to derby-dev yesterday.

Mike Matrigali <quote>
I can't tell from your report, are you testing each operation as a
separate transaction?  Any chance you can post your test programs?
If you can't do that, at least the DDL of the table and index
creates would help.

A major difference between derby and some other db's is that by
default it guarantees transaction consistency with each transaction
commit.  This means that it does a synchronous I/O with every
transaction commit, and thus update benchmarks which do one operation
per commit single user are not very interesting as they simply
measure the I/O throughput of the disk.

I don't see in the document what kind of disk you are using. Also for
Derby it is important to list what JVM you used to test.

I would be interested in helping you configure the test as appropriate
for Derby, and am interested at looking at the large DB results.
</quote>


> Embedded Derby-PointBase comparison
> -----------------------------------
>
>          Key: DERBY-465
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-465
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: Wish
>   Components: Test
>     Versions: 10.0.2.1, 10.0.2.0
>  Environment: Windows Server 2003, 4 processors, summary CPU 3.00 Ghz, RAM 1 Gb
>     Reporter: Peter Kovgan
>  Attachments: Benchmarks_info_independent.doc, derby-optimization.doc
>
> I have tested 4 major embedded DB.
> I have found that major disadvantage of Derby is 
> 1)low insert speed and 
> 2)significant performance degradation in select, update, delete  operation speed starting
from some table size.
> PointBase in comparison has not such degradation.
> It will be better if you improve your product.
> Good luck and thank you.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Mime
View raw message