Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1172 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2005 16:50:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jun 2005 16:50:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 25672 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2005 16:50:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 25392 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2005 16:50:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Development" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 25013 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2005 16:50:41 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:50:41 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of jta@bristowhill.com designates 66.75.162.134 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.75.162.134] (HELO ms-smtp-02-eri0.socal.rr.com) (66.75.162.134) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:50:42 -0700 Received: from [192.168.15.53] (cpe-204-210-23-212.san.res.rr.com [204.210.23.212]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.socal.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id j5MGobX7018044 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:50:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42B996DD.3080906@bristowhill.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:50:37 -0700 From: "Jean T. Anderson" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.2 (X11/20050324) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Development Subject: Re: Typo in FAQ References: <42B92F10.1010909@solsoft.com> <42B92F64.905@sun.com> <42B9322A.2030105@solsoft.com> In-Reply-To: <42B9322A.2030105@solsoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Thomas Lecavelier wrote: > Amit Handa wrote : > >>Then it should rather be (J2SE 5.0) JDK 5.0, >>the naming conventions have been changed. >> >>See this :- >>http://java.sun.com/j2se/naming_versioning_5_0.html > > > Thanks for the link. > I was still with "Commercial name 5.0" and "Developer name 1.5" idea in > mind. > > Sorry for the mistake. well, the faq entry is inconsistent -- says 5.1 in the question and 1.5 in the answer, so I'll clean that up. Thanks for mentioning it. -jean