Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Derby Development" <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <42A4AAE5.5030408@Sourcery.Org>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:58:29 -0700
From: Satheesh Bandaram <satheesh@Sourcery.Org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Derby Development <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Subject: Re: DERBY-147 - how do I know if it is part of 10.1 or any other
 release ?
References: 
 <1B37BEFB3456F1428E01932AFA147822019BB991@HOUEXCH902.Landmark.lgc.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <1B37BEFB3456F1428E01932AFA147822019BB991@HOUEXCH902.Landmark.lgc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Anyone has any cycles to work with or independently on Derby-147? The
bug is easily reproducable and has a patch done by Bernd. But the patch
needs some adjustment to make it complete, specifically, it should not
allow ORDER BY on an alias, if the SELECT list has multiple references
to the same alias. (Like SELECT column1 as A, column2 as A from T order
by A). A test case needs to be added as well.

It seems Bernd has interest in the fix and it would be good to address
it for 10.1. I am currently tied up at the moment to volunteer myself. :-)

Satheesh

Bernd Ruehlicke wrote:

>I put in a patch for this a while ago. Just want to make sure that it
>get's picked up and added to next release (10.1)?
>
>Bernd
>---
>I use Derby because I'm worth it
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient.  Any review, use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
>
>
>
>  
>