db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jean T. Anderson (JIRA)" <derby-...@db.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Closed: (DERBY-274) Document new limits in Derby docs
Date Thu, 09 Jun 2005 23:25:17 GMT
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-274?page=all ]
Jean T. Anderson closed DERBY-274:

    Fix Version:
     Resolution: Fixed

Committed Jeff's patch, revision 180159, that documents new identifier limits. Files modified:

Closing as "Fixed" based on Satheesh Bandaram <satheesh@Sourcery.Org> comment posted
to derby-dev: "I think this patch looks good, though I haven't searched for any other references
to older limits on identifier lengths." See http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200506.mbox/%3c42A64F0E.6080702@Sourcery.Org%3e

Note that the comment in the commit record at http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-commits/200506.mbox/%3c20050605223319.41650.qmail@minotaur.apache.org%3e
incorrectly references DERBY-287 instead of DERBY-274. The log comments for the three files
were corrected to reference DERBY 274.

> Document new limits in Derby docs
> ---------------------------------
>          Key: DERBY-274
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-274
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: Sub-task
>   Components: Documentation
>  Environment: all
>     Reporter: Jeff Levitt
>     Assignee: Jeff Levitt
>     Priority: Minor
>      Fix For:
>  Attachments: derby274.zip
> These new limits should be documented.  The page I assume most likely needs changes is:
> http://incubator.apache.org/derby/docs/ref/rrefidlengthlimits.html
> So I am planning on changing all of those to 128.  Is that correct?
> Also, I did a preliminary search and couldn't find many other instances where we explicitely
say anything has a limit of either 30 or 18.  The only items I found were that numeric floating
point constants are limited to a length of 30 characters, and index names have an 18 character
max length.  Should either or both of those go to 128?  Should either of those or both be
placed in the Limitations table (see the link above) as well?
> This is an easy patch to create, I can do it really easily if someone can provide me
with answers to the above questions.
> Thanks!

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message