Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Derby Development" <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 22:16:55 +0530
From: Shreyas Kaushik <Shreyas.Kaushik@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: Planning for a 10.1 release
In-reply-to: <54ac72d705051719171a779686@mail.gmail.com>
To: Derby Development <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Message-id: <42935A7F.400@sun.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)
References: <54ac72d705051719171a779686@mail.gmail.com>


Andrew McIntyre wrote:

>Hello derby-dev,
>
>Now that there have been some significant new contributions to Derby
>since 10.0.2.1 was released, I think we should begin planning for a
>10.1 release. As promised earlier, I'll volunteer to be release
>manager. So, here goes:
>
>1) Are there any new features or significant bugfixes near completion
>that should be in the 10.1 release? Dan mentioned that he would like
>to have his JSR-169 work included, Tomohito's fix for Derby-167 looks
>nearly complete, and David V.C. has a couple of items that look like
>they might be done soon. Any estimates on when these will be
>completed? Anything else not mentioned here?
>  
>
Derby-31. This would be a good one to have for this release.

~ Shreyas

>2) Are there any currently opened JIRA entries that should be
>considered showstoppers for this release? Any upgrade issues
>definitely need to be sorted out and tested, maybe we should have a
>JIRA for this. Documentation of new features should be finalized. I
>think there may already be a JIRA entry for this.
>
>3) Which bugs would be nice-to-have in this release but are not
>showstoppers? I personally would like to see the patch for Derby-1
>committed.
>
>4) Are there any issues surrounding the client that should be
>addressed before it is released? This deserves its own thread, and
>there's already one started here:
>
>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200505.mbox/%3c42784236.70504@apache.org%3e
>
>That thread got quiet, but I'll respond to that mail to keep the
>discussion going.
>
>5) Are there any changes to the packaging that people would like to
>see for this release?
>
>Feel free to add to this list and I'll keep track of all the responses. 
>
>andrew
>  
>