Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57908 invoked from network); 23 May 2005 20:49:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 May 2005 20:49:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 93571 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2005 20:49:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 93543 invoked by uid 500); 23 May 2005 20:49:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Development" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 93527 invoked by uid 99); 23 May 2005 20:49:37 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,SPF_HELO_FAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com (HELO e6.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.146) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 May 2005 13:49:36 -0700 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4NKnVCF009929 for ; Mon, 23 May 2005 16:49:32 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j4NKnVAD154396 for ; Mon, 23 May 2005 16:49:31 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4NKnVXg003510 for ; Mon, 23 May 2005 16:49:31 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (MARSDEN-IBM-LT1.usca.ibm.com [9.72.133.53]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4NKnTmI003323 for ; Mon, 23 May 2005 16:49:31 -0400 Message-ID: <429241D8.6090201@sbcglobal.net> Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 13:49:28 -0700 From: Kathey Marsden User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Development Subject: [VOTE] Network client driver should match embedded where possible for implementation specific behaviour. X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Satheesh filed DERBY-310 to manage this issue, but to clarify direction, I thought it worthwhile to submit this to vote: There are some differences in behaviour when using the client vs the embedded driver. Examples are DERBY-211 and DERBY-254. Other differences are not logged as JIRA entries but are evidenced by differences in test output. To create a seamless transition from embedded to client, the client driver should be changed to match embedded where possible. [ ] Change Network Client/Server behaviour to match embedded where possible.