Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 7368 invoked from network); 4 May 2005 18:01:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 May 2005 18:01:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 45310 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2005 18:02:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 45271 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2005 18:02:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Development" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 45249 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2005 18:02:57 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from brmea-mail-4.Sun.COM (HELO brmea-mail-4.sun.com) (192.18.98.36) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2005 11:02:57 -0700 Received: from phys-mpk-1 ([129.146.11.81]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j44I0pi7002656 for ; Wed, 4 May 2005 12:00:51 -0600 (MDT) Received: from conversion-daemon.mpk-mail1.sfbay.sun.com by mpk-mail1.sfbay.sun.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.24 (built Dec 19 2003)) id <0IFZ00E018EWRL@mpk-mail1.sfbay.sun.com> (original mail from David.Vancouvering@Sun.COM) for derby-dev@db.apache.org; Wed, 04 May 2005 11:00:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sun.com (d-usca03-225-156.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.145.225.156]) by mpk-mail1.sfbay.sun.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.24 (built Dec 19 2003)) with ESMTP id <0IFZ007SF8ME8A@mpk-mail1.sfbay.sun.com> for derby-dev@db.apache.org; Wed, 04 May 2005 10:59:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 10:59:20 -0700 From: David Van Couvering Subject: Re: [PATCH] Jira-189 ResultSetMetaData.getSchemaName and ResultSetMetaData.isWritable donot return correct values In-reply-to: <42785F42.3030606@gmail.com> To: Derby Development Message-id: <42790D78.8060403@sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 References: <42605A8A.4080607@debrunners.com> <4266988D.7080704@debrunners.com> <4276B6EC.3050609@sun.com> <427818A1.7050906@sun.com> <42785F42.3030606@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, Sunitha. I don't know if it was encrypted or not. The diff I got from stress.multi shows an overload problem: 7 del < ...running last checks via final.sql 7 add > ...timed out trying to kill all testers, > skipping last scripts (if any). NOTE: the > likely cause of the problem killing testers is > probably not enough VM memory OR test cases that > run for very long periods of time (so testers do not > have a chance to notice stop() requests Just for a sanity check, I ran stress.multi on an idle machine (I wasn't doing builds or anything else at the time), and this time it passed. So I think my machine was just overloaded and the test timed out. I don't think it's the same as what you're looking at. David Sunitha Kambhampati wrote: > David Van Couvering wrote: > >> It built fine and passed all the JDBC api tests, except for >> stress.multi, which I think is a problem with my machine and not your >> source... > > > Which stress.multi test failed.. was it the encrypted test run ? The > reason I ask is I am looking into the encrypted stress.multi failure > (Derby241) and wondering if this failure is similar to that one. If > you still have the testrun output, can you post some details on it > ie - the derby.log , the database etc. > > Thanks, > Sunitha.