From derby-dev-return-3688-apmail-db-derby-dev-archive=db.apache.org@db.apache.org Mon May 02 20:35:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3515 invoked from network); 2 May 2005 20:35:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 May 2005 20:35:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 40411 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2005 20:37:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 40383 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2005 20:37:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Development" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 40363 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2005 20:37:10 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of jta@bristowhill.com designates 66.75.162.134 as permitted sender) Received: from ms-smtp-02-qfe0.socal.rr.com (HELO ms-smtp-02-eri0.socal.rr.com) (66.75.162.134) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 May 2005 13:37:09 -0700 Received: from [192.168.15.53] (cpe-204-210-23-212.san.res.rr.com [204.210.23.212]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.socal.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id j42KZYX7013877 for ; Mon, 2 May 2005 13:35:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42768F16.6040600@bristowhill.com> Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 13:35:34 -0700 From: "Jean T. Anderson" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.2 (X11/20050324) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Development Subject: [OT] [RESULT] [VOTE] accept derby client contribution References: <20050502172844.14317.qmail@web81309.mail.yahoo.com> <42766F90.3000406@bristowhill.com> <427675DE.7030700@Sourcery.Org> <42768952.1080002@wiu.edu> In-Reply-To: <42768952.1080002@wiu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N scott hutinger wrote: > I agree with Susan and Jean, > > One should be able to send docs in html or xml if they want. I don't > think a lot of people want to mess with xml. The other option, is using > OpenOffice, and letting forrest convert the OpenOffice document, > although I think if many options are used, some of the doc may be a bit > modified from original. Of course, a lot of other formats exist. > > Possibly the docs should be updated on how to send in documents. I > don't think a lot of people want to mess with the XML stuff, and the > import thing is the content, not the type of document. Some people just > don't have time to figure out the xml syntax forrest uses. > > Possibly a list of preferred formats should be created. I don't think > it's a good idea to force one document style on people. > > scott > This is getting way off topic the original. Hey, Satheesh? Feeling paranoid yet? *This* doesn't have anything to do with your thread. I'll start a new reply with a [doc] topic. -jean