db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel John Debrunner <...@debrunners.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-253) Client should throw not implemented exception for depricated setUnicodeStream/getUnicodeStream
Date Tue, 03 May 2005 21:57:43 GMT
Kathey Marsden wrote:

> Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote:
>>What should the behaviour be? I think unimplemented is correct, implementing methods
that are not intended to be used seems wrong.
> The methods are there and send protocol to the server which can cause a
> protocol exception, so need to either throw a "Not Implemented" 
> exception or I guess be removed if possible.  Is it ok to remove them?
> Would everything build ok with jdk131?

I misread the bug's summary, so I deleted my comment.

And no you can't remove the methods as they are still defined in the
Java interfaces.


View raw message