db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sunitha Kambhampati (JIRA)" <derby-...@db.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Created: (DERBY-241) Encrypted run of stress.multi test failed once with a boot error with ibm142
Date Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:45:23 GMT
Encrypted run of stress.multi test failed once with a boot error with ibm142
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Key: DERBY-241
         URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-241
     Project: Derby
        Type: Bug
  Components: Store  
    Versions: 10.1.0.0    
 Environment: ibm142, machine is a dell, 1cpu, 256MB RAM, ~497Mhz, has an IDE disk and has
write cache enabled.
    Reporter: Sunitha Kambhampati


The stress.multi test failed for encryption run with ibm142 on  the following kind of machine
once when running derbyall suite but have not been able to reproduce it since then. 

The machine on which it failed is a  - dell, 1cpu, 256MB RAM, ~497Mhz, has an IDE disk and
has write cache enabled. As far as I can tell, the machine was up and running ok when the
tests were running.

Looking at the test directory for the stress.multi test, the derby.log seems to have a lot
of interrupts and looking at the errors shows the following boot error. 

 Booting Derby version The Apache Software Foundation - Apache Derby - 10.1.0.0 alpha - (31132):
instance c013800d-0103-64b3-44ec-ffffa1f4cf33
on database directory E:\classtest\JarResults.2005-04-20\ibm142_derbyall\derbyall\encryptionAll\encryption\multi\stress\mydb

ERROR XSLA7: Cannot redo operation Page Operation: Page(5,Container(0, 384)) pageVersion 3
: Insert :  Slot=2 recordId=8 in the log.

Here are some of my notes in trying to debug this: 

0) Copied the problematic database to a safe location and used sane jars for debugging.
1) Tried to boot the database using ij , and with the following debug property set  - derby.debug.true=DumpLogOnly,
this dumped all the log records into derby.log.  Then searching for log records for the container(0,384)
- found only 3 log records pertaining to it.  

there is one for create container and 2 records for insert. 
Space Operation for create container ( 0,384)
Page operation for (Page 5, Container(0,384)), version 3 , 
involving an insert at slot 2, record 8. 
Page operation for  version 4, involving insert at slot 3, 
record 9.  

=> There were no initPage operation for this page or any records pertaining to pageversion
1,2.   This means that log records were missing, but the only case this would be ok  is if
it was a system catalog table.  Since in case of create database, we flush the data pages
to disk itself,  so no logs in this case  is OK. 

2)Next step - tried to verify if it was a system catalog table. 
Looking in the org.apache.derby.impl.store.access.RAMAccessManager, getNextConglomId(),  the
container key - 384 maps to 18th id.   
One way I verified it was I created another empty database and saw if this table existed c180.dat
and it did.. which is right that is a system catalog table. 

3) To find the actual cause of the redo exception, I put in printstack traces in the code,
and putting in the debugger  -  the error printed was
ERROR XSDB1: Unknown page format at page Page(5,Container(0, 384))
It seemed like the page format was messed up.  I put printlns to get hte page format id (
in CachedPage, setIdentity)  and tried to dump the contents of the page. 
The checksum validation actually would have happened if all was ok with the format id but
since here the format id was messed up, this error is thrown instead of a checksum error.


4) There is a od facility in MKS that dumps the contents in hex and character format.  This
table mapped to the 18th id, and that is the c180.dat in seg0 directory.  Doing a dump  od
-c c180.dat shows stuff like this : 
 S   Y   S   C   S   _   B   A   C
0000034040     K   U   P   _   D   A   T   A   B   A   S   E   _   A   N   D
0000034060     _   E   N   A   B   L   E   _   L   O   G   _   A   R   C   H
0000034100     I   V   E   _   M   O   D   E  \

These seem to be system catalog procedure names, and it seems weird that it would not be encrypted.
    
Need to verify if system catalogs are encrypted, if so then this probably is a interrupt problem
with encryption. 




 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Mime
View raw message