db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jean T. Anderson (JIRA)" <derby-...@db.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-202) Old "product license" wording should be removed
Date Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:30:16 GMT
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-202?page=comments#action_62587 ]
     
Jean T. Anderson commented on DERBY-202:
----------------------------------------

I think removing the entire sentence might remove too much.

We go from this old version (in plain text):

  A Connection object represents a connection with a database. 
  Within the scope of one Connection, you access only a single 
  database. (Database-side JDBC procedures can allow you to access 
  more than one database in some circumstances.) Depending on your 
  Derby product license, a single application might allow one or 
  more Connections to Derby, either to a single database or to many
  different databases, provided that all the databases are within 
  the same system [...]

To this:

  A Connection object represents a connection with a database. 
  Within the scope of one Connection, you access only a single 
  database. (Database-side JDBC procedures can allow you to access 
  more than one database in some circumstances.)

I think you can add this back in:

  A single application might allow one or more Connections to Derby,
  either to a single database or to many different databases, provided 
  that all the databases are within  the same system [...]

> Old "product license" wording should be removed
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: DERBY-202
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-202
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: Documentation
>     Reporter: Jean T. Anderson
>     Priority: Minor
>  Attachments: licensechange.diff
>
> The "product license" wording in 
> http://incubator.apache.org/derby/manuals/develop/develop62.html is an old reference
to the Cloudscape license that was missed when the docs were contributed to Apache:
> "Depending on your Derby product license, a single application might allow one or more
Connections to Derby ..."
> In the DITA doc tree, it needs to be removed from this file:
> derby/docs/trunk/src/devguide/cdevconcepts36881.dita
>  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Mime
View raw message