Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 23954 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2005 23:19:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Mar 2005 23:19:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 71003 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2005 23:19:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 70961 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2005 23:19:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Development" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 70948 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2005 23:19:50 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from adsl-209-233-18-245.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net (HELO buttons.boynes.com) (209.233.18.245) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:19:49 -0800 Received: from [192.168.17.122] (unknown [69.111.157.225]) by buttons.boynes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4380311E43 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 15:19:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <422E3306.4060506@apache.org> Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:19:34 -0800 From: Jeremy Boynes User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Development Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (DERBY-158) PRIMARY KEY does not imply NOT NULL References: <404896768.1109886772517.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org> <1597307450.1109997947290.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Mamta Satoor wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > I was wondering if you added test cases for alter table for this bug? > I didn't - I did review the existing ones but didn't add anything as I thought they covered it (the behaviour for alter table did not change). -- Jeremy