Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67027 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2005 15:54:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Mar 2005 15:54:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 55441 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2005 15:54:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 55411 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2005 15:54:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Development" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 55398 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2005 15:54:04 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com (HELO e34.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.132) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 07:54:03 -0800 Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.11]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j26FrvKN381270 for ; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 10:53:57 -0500 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j26FrvK6125518 for ; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 08:53:57 -0700 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j26FrvUF006262 for ; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 08:53:57 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sig-9-48-126-136.mts.ibm.com [9.48.126.136]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j26FruOA006255 for ; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 08:53:57 -0700 Message-ID: <422B2793.2050708@debrunners.com> Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 07:53:55 -0800 From: Daniel John Debrunner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Development Subject: Re: Single JDK14 compile model? References: <4228E051.5010601@debrunners.com> <4228FC74.2020408@apache.org> <4229E45E.2070507@debrunners.com> <4229EFA4.8060708@apache.org> <002301c521d9$990468b0$1401a8c0@rpws002> <422B266B.8050401@debrunners.com> In-Reply-To: <422B266B.8050401@debrunners.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Daniel John Debrunner wrote: > If the community wants Derby to support J2ME that Derby developers have > to have an easy way to produce code that works in J2ME. The key point & I mess it up, "then", not "that". :-( If the community wants Derby to support J2ME then Derby developers have to have an easy way to produce code that works in J2ME. Dan.