Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 51792 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2005 01:04:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2005 01:04:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 49223 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2005 01:04:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 49199 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2005 01:04:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Development" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 49185 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2005 01:04:03 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com (HELO e6.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.146) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 17:04:00 -0800 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2513s8V009371 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 20:03:54 -0500 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j2513rLE198302 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 20:03:53 -0500 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2513ram030735 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 20:03:53 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (DMCSDJDT41P.usca.ibm.com [9.72.133.49]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2513qrn030707 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 20:03:53 -0500 Message-ID: <42290576.5050607@debrunners.com> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 17:03:50 -0800 From: Daniel John Debrunner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Development Subject: Re: Single JDK14 compile model? References: <4228E051.5010601@debrunners.com> <4228E80D.10907@sbcglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <4228E80D.10907@sbcglobal.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Kathey Marsden wrote: > Is there any bytecode incompatibility when you compile under jdk141 and > run under jdk131? I heard once that there was but it was merely > anecdote and I don't know if that is really true or not, but thought it > would be worth confirming that it is ok to compile under jdk141 and run > under jdk131. I don't believe so, in the current build model a single compiler is used, either javac from 1.4.2 or jikes, just different libraries on its compile classpath. Dan.