Return-Path: 
 <derby-dev-return-2373-apmail-db-derby-dev-archive=db.apache.org@db.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 6018 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2005 00:49:07 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2005 00:49:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 10596 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2005 00:49:07 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org
Received: (qmail 10400 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2005 00:49:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:derby-dev-help@db.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:derby-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:derby-dev@db.apache.org>
List-Id: <derby-dev.db.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Derby Development" <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org
Received: (qmail 10387 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2005 00:49:06 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of jta@bristowhill.com
 designates 66.75.162.134 as permitted sender)
Received: from ms-smtp-02-qfe0.socal.rr.com (HELO
 ms-smtp-02-eri0.socal.rr.com) (66.75.162.134)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 16:49:05 -0800
Received: from [192.168.15.53] (cpe-204-210-23-212.san.res.rr.com
 [204.210.23.212])
	by ms-smtp-02-eri0.socal.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id j230n2X7002622
	for <derby-dev@db.apache.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:49:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <42265EFD.8090301@bristowhill.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 16:49:01 -0800
From: "Jean T. Anderson" <jta@bristowhill.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041127)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Derby Development <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [doc] Where should the DITA source files be checked in?
References: <42261727.90909@bristowhill.com>
 <7540fec4eccc9e893d25e58cb0230094@gmail.com>
 <42265930.1080107@bristowhill.com>
 <febbb0b0c7058dcecc55acbee21b780a@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <febbb0b0c7058dcecc55acbee21b780a@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Andrew McIntyre wrote:
> <snip />
> The vote to accept DITA as the source format for the documentation was 
> approved. I don't see a problem with going ahead and checking in the 
> source to the repository, but perhaps you should give some more time for 
> comment before checking them in.

Sounds good.

> Do you know if the license for the DITA DTD's and the XSL files that 
> should be used to build the final output are compatible with the ASL?

Jeff, have you checked into this?

  -jean