Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 8446 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2005 18:44:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Mar 2005 18:44:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 17598 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2005 18:44:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 17549 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2005 18:44:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Development" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 17521 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2005 18:44:19 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com (HELO e6.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.146) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 10:44:18 -0800 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j21IiG19018898 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 13:44:16 -0500 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j21IiFT6246392 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 13:44:15 -0500 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j21IiF1L026831 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 13:44:15 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sig-9-48-112-101.mts.ibm.com [9.48.112.101]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j21IiAeW026546 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 13:44:13 -0500 Message-ID: <4224B7FB.7020800@debrunners.com> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 10:44:11 -0800 From: Daniel John Debrunner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Development Subject: Re: Overly conservative on reserved words? References: <4222030C.3010600@apache.org> <42237891.4020407@debrunners.com> <422385C9.3090507@apache.org> <4224A57E.8020801@sbcglobal.net> <4224B093.5080706@Sourcery.Org> In-Reply-To: <4224B093.5080706@Sourcery.Org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Satheesh Bandaram wrote: > I am tempted to call for a vote to rollback the change to add DISTINCT > clause to set operators, but will wait for community input before doing > so. I think we vote to accept patches, not to revoke them. At any time you can veto a patch (before or after it is committed) by voting -1 (with a reason). You don't need to call for a vote. Dan.