Return-Path: 
 <derby-dev-return-2930-apmail-db-derby-dev-archive=db.apache.org@db.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 61580 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2005 18:12:11 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Mar 2005 18:12:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 357 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2005 18:12:09 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org
Received: (qmail 321 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2005 18:12:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:derby-dev-help@db.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:derby-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:derby-dev@db.apache.org>
List-Id: <derby-dev.db.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Derby Development" <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org
Received: (qmail 296 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2005 18:12:09 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from web81606.mail.yahoo.com (HELO web81606.mail.yahoo.com)
 (206.190.37.123)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:12:07 -0800
Message-ID: <20050331181204.48020.qmail@web81606.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [63.202.83.131] by web81606.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
 Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:12:04 PST
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:12:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Jeff Levitt <derby@mylevita.com>
Subject: Re: Problems building DITA docs
To: Derby Development <derby-dev@db.apache.org>, fred@metadoc.fi
Cc: fred@metadoc.fi
In-Reply-To: 6667
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N


--- Fred Baube <fred@metadoc.fi> wrote:
<snip>
> With all this, I am still getting the same error as
> before.
> 
> I also tried the DITA OT 1.0.1beta, and get the same
> errors.
> 
> Perhaps it is a problem somehow unique to my
> installation
> (on Debian testing).
> 
</snip>

I'm wondering if the random failures on Windows
platforms is similar to the problem that Fred is
having?  

Right now it seems the only successful builds are from
Jean and Susan's tests.