db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Danesh Irani <danes...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Documentation source location in subversion
Date Tue, 08 Mar 2005 23:55:18 GMT
+1 to #2.
Shouldnt need to download the documentation unless we want to.


On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 18:15:34 -0500, Edward Rayl <erayl@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Andrew McIntyre wrote:
> 
> > Recently, a vote was approved that the source for the Derby
> > documentation should be XML DITA format. Details can be found in
> > these  threads:
> >
> > http://mail-archives.eu.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200502.mbox/
> > %3c20050211180100.98392.qmail@web81608.mail.yahoo.com%3e
> > http://mail-archives.eu.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200503.mbox/
> > %3c20050302193138.488.qmail@web81609.mail.yahoo.com%3e
> >
> > These source files should now be stored in the Subversion repository.
> > Please vote on one of the following locations to store the source:
> >
> > 1 - in derby/code, with each branch getting its own copy of the
> > source  as applicable, in docs/src
> >
> > 2 - in derby/docs, a new module with a similar trunk/branches/tags
> > layout underneath to easily match the version of the documentation to
> > the corresponding code.
> >
> > 3 - a hybrid approach, with the source checked in to derby/code, and
> > the remaining files necessary to build the docs in derby/docs as
> > suggested here:
> >
> > http://mail-archives.eu.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200503.mbox/
> > %3c422A3AC1.3010100@bristowhill.com%3e
> >
> > After reviewing the source, which comprises almost 1100 files (nearly
> > as many as the engine!), and will have its own building requirements,
> > I  am now thinking that everyone will be happier if the docs are
> > managed  separately from either the code or the website.
> >
> > My +1 vote goes to option 2.
> >
> > andrew
> >
> >
> >
> As an end user, option 2 seems to make more sense.   I would vote for
> that as well.
> 
>

Mime
View raw message