db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeremy Boynes <jboy...@apache.org>
Subject Re: About improvement of DERBY-134
Date Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:25:05 GMT
Satheesh Bandaram wrote:
> I am still new to Apache processes. According to the following DB project 
> guidelines,  "All contributors should have a Contributor License Agreement 
> <http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas>on file." I know bug patches are exempt 
> from this requirement.
> http://db.apache.org/source.html

Having a CLA on file does clear things up but we don't want everyone to 
be forecd to have a lawyer review some agreement before contributing. 
There's no real distinction between posting a patch for a bug fix or 
posting a patch that is an enhancement or improvement.

Now if the patch is a large body of work (by some definition of large) 
then we may well ask for a CLA, confirmation from the contributor's 
employer that they approve of the contribution, and possibly a software 
grant from them as well if it was something they may have title to. The 
premis is

1) if they did the work for a company we need to know that the company
    wants it contributed (sw grant and CCLA required)

2) if they did the work independently that their employer is aware

Finally, if someone does do a large body of work then there's a real 
good chance that they will become a committer at which point a CLA will 
be required anyway.


View raw message