Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 19984 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2005 16:34:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 16:34:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 39956 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2005 16:34:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 39895 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2005 16:34:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Development" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 39858 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2005 16:34:45 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown (hermes.apache.org: error in processing during lookup of jta@bristowhill.com) Received: from ms-smtp-03-qfe0.socal.rr.com (HELO ms-smtp-03-eri0.socal.rr.com) (66.75.162.135) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 08:34:44 -0800 Received: from [192.168.15.51] (dt081nd4.san.rr.com [204.210.23.212]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.socal.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id j12GYeuY018221 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 08:34:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <42010120.3000205@bristowhill.com> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 08:34:40 -0800 From: "Jean T. Anderson" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050101) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Development Subject: Re: javadoc on the website References: <4200D492.90202@sbcglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <4200D492.90202@sbcglobal.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Kathey Marsden wrote: > I think it would be helpful to have links to both the published and >internal javadoc on the Derby website. I think the published javadoc >should be available off of the manuals page and should correspond to >whatever version of docs we are featuring. Ultimately it would be good >to have the docs separated out by version. >... > > > I agree this would be good to do, but the javadoc shouldn't be part of the forrest web site source (too many files). It would be easy to set up a spot for the web site to point to that would be "outside" the forrest box proper: http://incubator.apache.org/derby/api Or perhaps hang it off the dist directory? For example -- http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/derby/10.0.2.1/api That would keep the javadoc with each release. -jean