db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA)" <derby-...@db.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (DERBY-139) LOCAL as a reserved keyword does not match other databases
Date Wed, 09 Feb 2005 19:49:13 GMT
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-139?page=comments#action_58843 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-139:

Fixed in the trunk
New Revision: 153095

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=153095
Fix Derby-139 - remove LOCAL as a SQL reserved word.


> LOCAL as a reserved keyword does not match other databases
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>          Key: DERBY-139
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-139
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: SQL
>     Versions:
>     Reporter: Daniel John Debrunner
>     Assignee: Daniel John Debrunner
>      Fix For:

> While the SQL standard mandates LOCAL as a reserved keyword, most other databases such
as Oracle, SQL Server, MySQL and DB2 do not enforce it.
> Derby enforces this and limits application migration to Derby.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:

View raw message