Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76104 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2005 03:43:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jan 2005 03:43:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 89269 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2005 03:43:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 89241 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2005 03:43:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Development" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 89227 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2005 03:43:48 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown (hermes.apache.org: error in processing during lookup of jta@bristowhill.com) Received: from ms-smtp-01-qfe0.socal.rr.com (HELO ms-smtp-01-eri0.socal.rr.com) (66.75.162.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:43:47 -0800 Received: from [192.168.15.51] (dt081nd4.san.rr.com [204.210.23.212]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.socal.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id j0J3hakM016921; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:43:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <41EDD768.5000202@bristowhill.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:43:36 -0800 From: "Jean T. Anderson" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050101) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Development CC: acemccloudxx@comcast.net Subject: JPOX JDO (was "Hibernate problems with snapshot") References: <20050117142532.D8366B9F78@poczta.interia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20050117142532.D8366B9F78@poczta.interia.pl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Did you have any problems/issues getting JPOX JDO working with Derby? thanks, -jean On January 17, 2005, wegorkie@interia.pl wrote: >... >You can use JDO instead - I am using JPOX JDO with Derby and it is ok. >... > >