Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 25761 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2005 17:31:06 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jan 2005 17:31:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 75012 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2005 17:30:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 74930 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2005 17:30:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Development" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 74863 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2005 17:30:48 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com (HELO e3.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.143) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 09:30:37 -0800 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e3.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j03HUUCd015874 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 12:30:30 -0500 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j03HUTdS127604 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 12:30:30 -0500 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j03HUTOs032392 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 12:30:29 -0500 Received: from debrunners.com (IBM-KT5II609ZW0.usca.ibm.com [9.72.133.45]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j03HUT07032379 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 12:30:29 -0500 Message-ID: <41D98117.3040801@debrunners.com> Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 09:29:59 -0800 From: Daniel John Debrunner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20031008 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Development Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-13) Quoted names with embedded period mishandled in from list References: <793302441.1104727949587.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org> In-Reply-To: <793302441.1104727949587.JavaMail.jira@ajax.apache.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.8.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Shreyas Kaushik (JIRA) wrote: > [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-13?page=comments#action_57179 ] > > Shreyas Kaushik commented on DERBY-13: > -------------------------------------- > > I am proposing a fix for this issue. I am attaching the diffs of all the files that need to have changes. > > As per the discussions we have had on this issue the problem was with comparing exposed names. I have changed the comparision of all exposed names to the TableName objects. > > As Sateesh had suggested in one of his earlier mails on this issue, > > public ResultColumnList getResultColumnsForList(String allTableName,ResultColumnList inputRcl,Name tableName) > > method in the FromTable.java the "allTableName" needs to be a TableName object instead of a String object. I have made those changes as well for the comparision to happen between TableName objects. > > For the above change to happen we need to get a handle to the TableName object that is stored in the java/engine/org/apache/derby/impl/sql/compile/AllResultColumn. As of now it does not have a method to actually get a handle to the TableName object stored in this. So I added a new method that returns a handle to the TableName object stored internally. > > I also ran the tests of derbylang and am attaching the diffs of them as well. Some of the tests fail there and I don't know the exact reason for the failures.( I think they are not failures ) I actually think you are seeing unrelated failures. It seems that if Derby is built and tested on linix or unix then about six tests fail, it looks like a difference in the number of characters in a long line. I'm not sure if it's the build process, ij or the test diff program that has the problem. If you build on Windows and test on linux or unix the all the tests pass. Dan. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB2YEXIv0S4qsbfuQRAqK2AJ9j0+VWZyBTvDG2I0CuPtND6mnWGgCfXpUs Nd4OzchMh0E550yTvTczFvM= =iQmd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----