db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bernd Ruehlicke (JIRA)" <derby-...@db.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Created: (DERBY-119) Add ALTER TABLE option to change column from NULL to NOT NULL
Date Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:14:18 GMT
Add ALTER TABLE option to change column from NULL to NOT NULL 
--------------------------------------------------------------

         Key: DERBY-119
         URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-119
     Project: Derby
        Type: New Feature
    Reporter: Bernd Ruehlicke


There was a thread about this on the Cloudscape forum

http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/dw_thread.jsp?message=4103269&cat=19&thread=59941&forum=370#4103269

Since this describes the problem I will just copy the content of this entry as my dexscription


The content of this was 

"
Hi,

I stumbled across a behaviour of cloudscape which is not a bug but IMHO an implementation
choice. To assign a primary key to a table using ALTER TABLE all columns must be declared
NOT NULL first, which can only be specified upon column creation (no ALTER TABLE statement
exists to change the NOT NULL property of a column).

Most databases I know do two things differently:
1) when a primary key is assigned all pk columns are automatically set to NOT NULL, if one
of them contains NULL values, the ALTER TABLE statement fails
2) it is possible to alter the column to set the NOT NULL property after column creation (fails
when there are already records containing NULL values)

If I have understood the limitations correctly in Cloudscape I have no choice but to remove
and re-add the column which is supposed to be used in the primary key, if it is not already
declared as NOT NULL. This means that in the case of a table containing valid data (unique
and not null) in the column in all records, I would have to export the data, remove and re-add
the column and reimport that data, which would not be necessary e.g. in Oracle or MaxDB.

Is it possible to change that behaviour or is there a good reason for it? It looks as if it
makes the life of the user more difficult than necessary for certain metadata manipulations.
Making it possible to alter the NOT NULL property of a column would solve this and IMHO having
a primary key constraint do this implicitly makes sense as well. 

Thanks in advance for any insight on this,

Robert"



-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Mime
View raw message