Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 7676 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2004 01:24:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Dec 2004 01:24:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 69160 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2004 01:24:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 69119 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2004 01:24:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Development" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 69097 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2004 01:24:10 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com (HELO e33.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.131) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 17:24:08 -0800 Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.11]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id iBA1O4Dr202284 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 20:24:05 -0500 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id iBA1O4gW321542 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:24:04 -0700 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBA1O3WS013487 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:24:03 -0700 Received: from debrunners.com ([9.72.133.88]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBA1O3UO013478 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 18:24:03 -0700 Message-ID: <41B8FAAD.5060701@debrunners.com> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 17:23:57 -0800 From: Daniel John Debrunner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20031008 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derby Development Subject: Re: next release - thoughts on upgrade? References: <41B8F2B9.4030109@sbcglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <41B8F2B9.4030109@sbcglobal.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.8.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mike Matrigali wrote: > I would like to start a thread on what derby's approach to upgrade in > future releases should be. I am motivated as this affects some design > issues for derby-96. To start it off I will try to summarize what > model cloudscape had or was moving to. > Just to add some background, I also discussed the versioning/upgrade in the first two posts of this thread http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/BrowseList?listName=derby-dev@db.apache.org&by=thread&from=869346 Dan. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBuPqtIv0S4qsbfuQRAs6ZAKDfgZgArZLWhal6R0ZIgjyJraRBRwCg2zR8 IFKL4sKH7YWR7ckm2K3h1AY= =I8bL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----