db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel John Debrunner <...@debrunners.com>
Subject Re: [PATCH] creating Derby plug-in for Eclipse
Date Sat, 18 Dec 2004 03:21:55 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rajesh Kartha wrote:

>
> Hello all,
>
> I was wondering if anybody got a chance to review the patches I sent
> most recently, for creating the Derby Plug-in for Eclipse, and commit
> the changes. Please do
> let me know, if there are any other changes needed.
>
> Regards,
> Rajesh
>
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Rajesh Kartha wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have


>> - changed the version entry in plugin.xml to be consistent with the
>> Derby builds: example - 10.1.0.0 (111546M)

My only comment is this version in plugin.xml. What is the most natural
version here, matching Eclipse terminology (the original _v111546 you
had) or matching Derby's version string output from sysinfo etc?

I asked before why you had picked the _v111546 format, I didn't request
a change to the Derby format, I was just trying to understand where that
format came from.

Dan.



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBw6HcIv0S4qsbfuQRAtXoAKCTxbOwL5eyEjOjLXM5XSnQsg8OjgCgoX2m
FY64hebZ0ErH/4Kp4zppUoQ=
=Hgd8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Mime
View raw message