db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gursharan Singh <sk149...@bur-mail1.east.sun.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] 10.0.2.1 release
Date Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:29:39 GMT
+1 , looks good to me

thanks
Shreyas
	From: Daniel John Debrunner <djd@debrunners.com>
	Subject: [VOTE] 10.0.2.1 release
	To: Derby Discussion <derby-user@db.apache.org>, derby-dev 
<derby-dev@db.apache.org>
	MIME-version: 1.0
	Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
	X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
	Delivered-to: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org
	Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
	Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
	User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4.1) 
Gecko/20031008
	X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0	tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO
	X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
	X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.8.0
	X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
	X-Virus-Checked: Checked
	List-Post: <mailto:derby-dev@db.apache.org>
	List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:derby-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org>
	List-Help: <mailto:derby-dev-help@db.apache.org>
	List-Id: <derby-dev.db.apache.org>
	Original-recipient: rfc822;Shreyas.Kaushik@sun.com
	
	-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
	Hash: SHA1
	
	Cross posting to derby-user as well.
	
	In case anyone is unclear, anyone can vote on this release, either to
	approve it or to point out an issue. You pick the criteria for accepting
	it, typically it would be downloading it and testing it in some way,
	e.g. with your own application.
	
	
	Dan.
	
	
	> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
	> From: Samuel Andrew McIntyre <fuzzylogic@nonintuitive.com>
	> Subject: [VOTE] 10.0.2.1 release
	> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 09:27:17 -0800
	>
	>
	> Hello derby-dev,
	>
	> It appears that there are now no objections to the updated binaries
	> that I have posted here:
	>
	> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/derby/10.0.2.1/
	>
	> from the Incubator PMC. However, I would like to encourage anyone
	> interested to review the binaries and then vote if you find them
	> acceptable. While it may appear that they are already posted as a
	> release, due to a minor misunderstanding on my part, there still needs
	> to be a formal vote to accept them as a release here. If there are any
	> problems with the binaries that are posted, I will need to remove 
them.
	> If there are no problems and the vote passes, then I will leave them 
as
	> is and ask Jean to update the website to point to our first release.
	> :-)
	>
	> And of course, my vote: +1
	>
	> andrew
	
	
	> On Dec 1, 2004, at 9:38 AM, Kathey Marsden wrote:
	>
	>> Andrew, what date/svn # is this release based on?
	>
	> Since I needed to update STATUS and README for the Incubator, I also
	> updated the all the jars (and CHANGES, etc.) with jars built from
	> revision 106978.
	>
	> andrew
	
	
	-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
	Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
	Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
	
	iD8DBQFBsnmtIv0S4qsbfuQRAmeGAJ49IREPqLIJQGQxDT9UZCGobzSY6QCgladp
	KUG5XAaA8V2MXOnU6o97NLI=
	=S+mz
	-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
	



	 ______
        /_____/\                    
       /_____\\ \     Gursharan Singh         
      /_____\ \\ /    Java Software East
     /_____/ \/ / /   Sun Microsystems
    /_____/ /   \//\  Burlington, Massachusetts 
    \_____\//\   / /  Phone 781-4422255
     \_____/ / /\ /   http://java.sun.com
      \_____/ \\ \               
       \_____\ \\    
        \_____\/    




Mime
View raw message