Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 32168 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2004 21:32:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 2004 21:32:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 10354 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2004 21:32:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 10121 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2004 21:32:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Development" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 10110 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2004 21:32:24 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [63.89.163.151] (HELO exch-bel0.attachmate.com) (63.89.163.151) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:32:23 -0800 Received: from EXCH-BEL4.attachmate.com ([149.82.2.114]) by exch-bel0.attachmate.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:33:17 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: User Defined Types Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:32:16 -0800 Message-ID: <71A4A5D6F4E5634387B896E765160645010E0360@EXCH-BEL4.attachmate.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: User Defined Types Thread-Index: AcTQ1KcGPQVwSCxETbCkMTO94rr4VwABcSkw From: "Jacob Barrett" To: "Derby Development" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Nov 2004 21:33:17.0752 (UTC) FILETIME=[E179CB80:01C4D0DA] X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: Kathey Marsden [mailto:kmarsden@Sourcery.Org]=20 > I think if we enable Java Types we should do it according to=20 > the SQL Standard, rather than just going back to the old=20 > Cloudscape proprietary way. I totally agree. This patch isn't the best solution. It is just a stop gap for those that want the original functionality so they can get going again with Derby. -Jake