Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 55544 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2004 23:50:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2004 23:50:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 20238 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2004 23:50:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 20176 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2004 23:50:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Derby Development" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 20164 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2004 23:50:05 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.14.202.141] (HELO mgd.gluecode.com) (64.14.202.141) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 16:50:05 -0700 Received: from [10.0.1.6] (ca-stmnca-cuda2-blade8b-82.stmnca.adelphia.net [68.65.226.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by mgd.gluecode.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i91NxM1q009901 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:59:23 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <76B44F5D-13FE-11D9-B927-000D93C5B79C@gluecode.com> References: <76B44F5D-13FE-11D9-B927-000D93C5B79C@gluecode.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <9C911B90-1404-11D9-B927-000D93C5B79C@gluecode.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Dain Sundstrom Subject: Re: Java 1.4 nested exceptions? Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:50:02 -0700 To: "Derby Development" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I see this is Sun's bad code in SQLException... never mind -dain -- Dain Sundstrom Chief Architect Gluecode Software 310.536.8355, ext. 26 On Oct 1, 2004, at 4:06 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > Have you considered converting EmbedSQLException to use Java 1.4 > nesting instead of using custom nesting logic? I am finding that the > nested exceptions don't get logged, so it is very difficult to debug > problems. > > -dain > > -- > Dain Sundstrom > Chief Architect > Gluecode Software > 310.536.8355, ext. 26