db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Samuel Andrew McIntyre <fuzzylo...@nonintuitive.com>
Subject Re: Regarding Derby42 : Do not store the encryption key length and the encryption block size in service.properties:
Date Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:59:49 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Oct 18, 2004, at 3:36 PM, Sunitha Kambhampati wrote:

> b) database *created* with version that has this fix will not work 
> with previous versions since the previous version will try to get the 
> encryption block size from the service.properties and will not find 
> it.
>
> So, because of  (b), the fix to remove encryption block size from 
> service.properties will require the versioning numbers to change, is 
> that right (?).

Correct, this would be appropriate for a 10.1 or 11.0 release, 
whichever is next for us. I suppose we may want to have a vote on that.

Ron, can we get additional version numbers for targeting bugs in Jira? 
e.g. 10.0.2.1, 10.0.2.2, 10.1.0.0, 11.0.0.0

Thanks,
andrew
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFBd/kcDfB0XauCH7wRAkYbAKCciz4rLvL5I31TvLt8dL4G/voCNgCeIRdg
SDlI6MUs0+7j/fcTfLH5K38=
=ZYEg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Mime
View raw message