Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Derby Development" <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4140DA26.8040704@collab.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 17:33:10 -0500
From: John McNally <jmcnally@collab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Derby Development <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Clarification of Apache DB Project guideline for submitting docs
 and patches
References: <4140BF29.90709@bristowhill.com>
In-Reply-To: <4140BF29.90709@bristowhill.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The two sentences would appear to have little to do with each other.  If 
the last sentence has any place in that section I think it would be more 
appropriate within the first paragraph.

John McNally

Jean T. Anderson wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Hi, Ken and/or Rodney,
>
>The third paragraph in the "License" section on
>http://db.apache.org/source.html page says "Any code, document, or
>binary that is committed to the Project's repositories, but not being
>donated to the ASF, must be clearly marked as such.  All contributors
>should have a Contributor License agreement
><http://db.apache.org/agreement.html> on file."
>
>It's that last sentence I'm curious about. Could you clarify this
>guideline?
>
>thanks!
>
> -jean
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
>iD8DBQFBQL8oF0L6u5lYbCYRAiBuAJwNm2C2mOEwa9l4gdw9+JZbyqn9XQCfVGB/
>xg1An2NA3fGGYEtNrk7+BQg=
>=xG0k
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>  
>