Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 62609 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2004 16:02:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2004 16:02:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 76191 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2004 16:02:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 76088 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2004 16:02:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: "Derby Development" Reply-To: "Derby Development" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 76077 invoked by uid 99); 1 Sep 2004 16:02:21 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [209.237.227.194] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (209.237.227.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 09:02:21 -0700 Received: (qmail 62554 invoked by uid 1304); 1 Sep 2004 16:02:20 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Sep 2004 16:02:20 -0000 Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 09:02:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Rodney Waldhoff To: Derby Development Subject: Re: Derby commit records are posted to derby-commits@db.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4135E553.9070800@bristowhill.com> Message-ID: <20040901085913.C2115@minotaur.apache.org> References: <4134AB9D.3010306@bristowhill.com> <413543B3.6000000@debrunners.com> <4135E553.9070800@bristowhill.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Jean T. Anderson wrote: > | We are caught between the Apache DB guidelines that seem to state a > | commit list is used, and copying Apache DB sub-projects that use a > | single developer list. I'm not sure where you seeing that guideline. Is is http://db.apache.org/communication.html? I think that's meant to be more descriptive than prescriptive. Is there another place you're thinking of? If so, we should change it. > Is a vote necessary? Lazy consensus seems to carry the day on this. > If so, I'll organize it. If not, I'll simply update the information in > http://incubator.apache.org/derby/derby_mail.html . > > ~ -jean >