db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Riad Al-Shaalan" <r...@carpets.com>
Subject Re: Building Derby Using IDE
Date Wed, 01 Sep 2004 16:49:27 GMT
I agree that ant is important for the Derby build process, but Eclipse gives
me incremental building
and other time-saving benefits. I do not want to wait minutes for ant to
build Derby after changing only a few files.
If anyone wants to commit the changes made in their IDE they should test if
ant builds correctly first.

- Riad

----- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel John Debrunner" <djd@debrunners.com>
To: "Derby Development" <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: Building Derby Using IDE


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Riad Al-Shaalan wrote:
>
> | I'm using Eclipse to build derby and noticed that the jdbc 2 and 3
> | classes are in the same package. Is there any consideration in placing
> | them in their own unique package (i.e. org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc2 and
> | org.apache.derby.jdbc3)? I think it would make the build setup (in
> | Eclipse) easier.
>
> Can you setup Eclipse just to call ant and use the existing build rules?
> Having to setup your own build rules in Eclipse just seems the wrong
> approach to me, there is a chance separate build instructions will be
> different and eventually lead to commits causing build errors when using
> the "official" ant targets.
>
> Dan.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFBNe5KIv0S4qsbfuQRAle+AJ9yiB16JwEd9VO/YLo2gSaAVu7YNQCfSREf
> HljEg9cdEiVfgj78qXZ+VPA=
> =uasC
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>


Mime
View raw message