Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 82743 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2004 16:47:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Aug 2004 16:47:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 94455 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2004 16:47:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 94408 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2004 16:47:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: List-Id: "Derby Development" Reply-To: "Derby Development" Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 94393 invoked by uid 99); 31 Aug 2004 16:47:30 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown (hermes.apache.org: error in processing during lookup of jta@bristowhill.com) Received: from [66.75.162.133] (HELO ms-smtp-01-eri0.socal.rr.com) (66.75.162.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:47:29 -0700 Received: from [192.168.2.51] (dt089n06.san.rr.com [204.210.25.6]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.socal.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id i7VGlP6j028919 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:47:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4134AB9D.3010306@bristowhill.com> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:47:25 -0700 From: "Jean T. Anderson" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040819) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: derby-dev@db.apache.org Subject: Derby commit records are posted to derby-commits@db.apache.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Originally I thought commit records were supposed to go to derby-dev@db.apache.org, but they are in fact going to derby-commits@db.apache.org (you can find it at http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/). So, any thoughts on this? Should they continue to go to the separate list? Or would people prefer they go to derby-dev? If everyone wants to keep them on derby-commits, I'll add that mail list to http://incubator.apache.org/derby/derby_mail.html . ~ -jean -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBNKucF0L6u5lYbCYRAmjdAJ9Vj1Ix3lG9BelLn0wm76lLBEgTXgCfUmwx Le0XFG2jCUoUgGKFvKzLhoM= =f28n -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----