Return-Path: 
 <derby-dev-return-48-apmail-db-derby-dev-archive=db.apache.org@db.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 5123 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2004 17:26:27 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Aug 2004 17:26:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 64023 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2004 17:26:26 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-db-derby-dev-archive@db.apache.org
Received: (qmail 63944 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2004 17:26:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact derby-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:derby-dev-help@db.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:derby-dev-unsubscribe@db.apache.org>
list-post: <mailto:derby-dev@db.apache.org>
List-Id: "Derby Development" <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Derby Development" <derby-dev@db.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list derby-dev@db.apache.org
Received: (qmail 63932 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2004 17:26:26 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0
	tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,NO_REAL_NAME
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [216.148.212.183] (HELO w01.bloglines.com) (216.148.212.183)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with SMTP; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:26:24 -0700
Received: (qmail 2872 invoked by uid 99); 20 Aug 2004 17:26:23 -0000
Message-ID: <1093022783.735321991.2870.sendItem@bloglines.com>
Date: 20 Aug 2004 17:26:23 -0000
From: chicagokarl.2725385@bloglines.com
To: derby-dev@db.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] on repository layout
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

I vote for option one.

--- Derby Development" <derby-dev@db.apache.org
wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> The import
of the derby code is looming; it would be nice to have a
> decision about
the repository structure.  So let's measure consensus the
> Apache way and
vote on it. :)  I think that we can collate the results
> next Monday (8/23);
our community is still small enough that we don't
> need to wait a long time
to close the vote.
> 
> [ ]  Option 1: Keep the code and site pages in separately-versionable

> trees ( derby/site/{trunk,tags,branches}/<pages> and
> derby/code/{t,t,b}<code>
)
> 
> [ ]  Option 2: Put all things Derby into a single tree
> ~     (
derby/{trunk,tags,branches}/{<code>,<pages>} )
> 
> 
> Dan.
> -----BEGIN
PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG
with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFBJixEIv0S4qsbfuQRAsLgAKCPsTWhm56KzE3/szQEJOZsyHPeXQCgvNaG

> xO8CocfgPoo0i3i+Azdwbc4=
> =U+Z1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
>