db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ahimanikya Satapathy" <ASatapa...@SeeBeyond.com>
Subject RE: derby repository structure
Date Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:02:11 GMT
Hi All,

I just happen to check derby web site while checking status for Axion in
apache incubator site. Was curious to know what's going if someone can
give a brief into.

Thanks
Ahi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:Ken.Coar@Golux.Com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 4:58 AM
> To: Derby Development
> Subject: derby repository structure
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> the svn repository for the derby project has been prepared, but it
might
> not have an optimal structure.  no code has been imported yet, just
> pages for the web site.
> 
> according to the svn people, 'best practice' is for there to be three
> areas in each versionable module; one for the main-line development
> (called 'trunk'), one for branches (called, curiously enough,
'branches'),
> and one for tagged versions.  so for module foo, with a single file
> 'file.name' and a single branch 'B1', the module layout would look
> something
> like:
> 
> /repos/foo/tags
> /repos/foo/branches/B1/file.name
> /repos/foo/trunk/file.name
> 
> the derby project has at least two discrete parts: derby itself, and
> the site web pages.  currently the module is set up (with prefix
> '/repos/asf/incubator/') as:
> 
> derby/code/{trunk,tags,branches}
> derby/site/{trunk,tags,branches}
> 
> some questions have been raised about whether this is the best
structure;
> an alternative would be:
> 
> derby/{trunk,tags,branches}/
> derby/{trunk,tags,branches}/site
> 
> making the site just another piece of the overall project.
> 
> which layout do you think is better?
> 
> everything *can* be rearranged after the code upload, but it would be
> a lot simpler if any structural changes were made before then. :-)
> the only thing that would need to be moved about would be the existing
> site docco, and it's simply a matter of moving a directory
(essentially).
> - --
> #ken	P-)}
> 
> Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
> Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/
> 
> "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iQCVAwUBQSSVxprNPMCpn3XdAQEsOAP/VKI5XzMrM16H0GRwAuncFIECmSQrqAGK
> gOo2vS8iwVNU523k8J5tTiahjBRkNjPthStneA29GM3V9Ay1AcyG4Rap/ripxr+Q
> Cz+yPhqktvx14x8F1dCfYNwIPDT6IkVw/pQkDAVZtDGDCl9KjpcPSLL2n+VbthYA
> gkWgPRyqIvo=
> =RhxF
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mime
View raw message