db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rodent of Unusual Size <Ken.C...@Golux.Com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] on repository layout
Date Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:13:06 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Cloudscape Testing wrote:
>
> That means though, that I would include the user documentation in the
> code part of the repository, since we would want to keep that in sync
> with the code that it documents. The developer would also then have the
> current doc set in their build tree for reference, and a person could
> build a full binary distribution from the source distribution.

as only a mentor for the derby podling, i don't feel qualified to have
a vote on this issue.  however, i'd like to suggest that *if* the decision
is to keep the docco and the code separate, then developers who are
keeping up with the bleeding edge of svn aren't forced to have it, and
it can always be included in any release tarballs when they're built.
- --
#ken	P-)}

Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/

"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBQSntYprNPMCpn3XdAQFVJwP9G0vrFuz4tStvipZJocEYQ/a9wOmQvq5u
FQf5ZKB9nnvPDYfi2Wkspq19tCXkO56UAazeJ1K9nOIEW0HAhT6dRt1dv1BMWROY
Cuv3ErHPvG3Q8XFhaCfPr7BWv1TPdGJck7MgrIsS6gaJhpBorZlowrVTzTsvPAQA
fBWMJjUukAo=
=6Vhw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Mime
View raw message