db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Matrigali <mikem_...@sbcglobal.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] on repository layout
Date Fri, 20 Aug 2004 20:26:38 GMT
I hope going forward to see stable and development branches for the 
code, and it
seems less confusing to separate out the stuff that need not be branched 
with the code.
I vote for option 1

Mike Matrigali

Daniel John Debrunner wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The import of the derby code is looming; it would be nice to have a
> decision about the repository structure.  So let's measure consensus the
> Apache way and vote on it. :)  I think that we can collate the results
> next Monday (8/23); our community is still small enough that we don't
> need to wait a long time to close the vote.
>
> [ ]  Option 1: Keep the code and site pages in separately-versionable
> trees ( derby/site/{trunk,tags,branches}/<pages> and
> derby/code/{t,t,b}<code> )
>
> [ ]  Option 2: Put all things Derby into a single tree
> ~     ( derby/{trunk,tags,branches}/{<code>,<pages>} )
>
>
> Dan.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFBJixEIv0S4qsbfuQRAsLgAKCPsTWhm56KzE3/szQEJOZsyHPeXQCgvNaG
> xO8CocfgPoo0i3i+Azdwbc4=
> =U+Z1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>


Mime
View raw message