db-derby-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jason Rimmer <jrim...@irth.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] on repository layout
Date Fri, 20 Aug 2004 18:11:26 GMT
	While I've used svn a fair amount I am not a committer so take my vote 
with a grain of salt.
	Option 1.

Daniel John Debrunner wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> The import of the derby code is looming; it would be nice to have a
> decision about the repository structure.  So let's measure consensus the
> Apache way and vote on it. :)  I think that we can collate the results
> next Monday (8/23); our community is still small enough that we don't
> need to wait a long time to close the vote.
> 
> [ ]  Option 1: Keep the code and site pages in separately-versionable
> trees ( derby/site/{trunk,tags,branches}/<pages> and
> derby/code/{t,t,b}<code> )
> 
> [ ]  Option 2: Put all things Derby into a single tree
> ~     ( derby/{trunk,tags,branches}/{<code>,<pages>} )
> 
> 
> Dan.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQFBJixEIv0S4qsbfuQRAsLgAKCPsTWhm56KzE3/szQEJOZsyHPeXQCgvNaG
> xO8CocfgPoo0i3i+Azdwbc4=
> =U+Z1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 

-- 
Jason Rimmer
jrimmer at irth dot net

Mime
View raw message