db-ddlutils-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jun Li" <allanju...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Potential object name conflict on Oracle.
Date Thu, 31 Aug 2006 05:42:33 GMT
Any progress on this issue?

On 7/24/06, Jun Li <allanjunli@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  1. Do we need sequence and trigger for those temp tables?
> 2. When truncate the object name, keep the two underlines characters
> rather than others.
>
>
> On 7/24/06, Thomas Dudziak <tomdzk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 7/23/06, Jun Li <allanjunli@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Due to the limitation of maximum object name length (30) on Oracle,
> > the
> > > script generated could have object name conflict.
> >
> > That is true, but there is nothing I can do about it. The problem is
> > that the name generation algorithm must create reproducable names, so
> > unique identifiers cannot be used.
> > A better way to handle this will be abailable once sequences/triggers
> > are directly supported by DdlUtils because you then can name them
> > yourself.
> >
> > Tom
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --------------
> Cheers,
>
> Jun
>



-- 
--------------
Cheers,
Jun

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message