Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-ddlutils-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 46647 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2005 22:47:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Dec 2005 22:47:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 5041 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2005 22:47:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-ddlutils-user-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 4991 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2005 22:47:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ddlutils-user-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ddlutils-user@db.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ddlutils-user@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 4973 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2005 22:47:25 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:47:25 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [69.55.235.171] (HELO mvdb.net) (69.55.235.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 14:47:24 -0800 Received: (qmail 29609 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2005 22:47:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [10.21.21.40]) (80.126.215.98) by 69.55.235.171 with SMTP; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 22:47:01 +0000 Message-ID: <4398B7ED.1010304@mvdb.net> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:47:09 +0100 From: Martin van den Bemt User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ddlutils-user@db.apache.org Subject: Re: other open source projects using ddlutils? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jonathan Carlson wrote: > I just learned that Cayenne (http://objectstyle.org/cayenne) will be > able to use a generic DataObject class in their 1.2M9 build. They have > a lot of accessible metadata just like DDLUtils does; but their downside > is that they can't/don't alter the database like DDLUtils does. Their > upside is that they have all the nice persistence optimizations like > lazy loading of related rows, prefetching, catching, etc. > > Too bad the XML data definition formats between the two are different > :-( You are always welcome to write something that can converts from ddlutils to cayenne and the other way around ;) Mvgr, Martin