From ddlutils-dev-return-2027-apmail-db-ddlutils-dev-archive=db.apache.org@db.apache.org Tue Nov 02 02:24:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-db-ddlutils-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22490 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2010 02:24:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Nov 2010 02:24:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 66347 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2010 02:24:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-db-ddlutils-dev-archive@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 66275 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2010 02:24:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ddlutils-dev-help@db.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: ddlutils-dev@db.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list ddlutils-dev@db.apache.org Received: (qmail 66267 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2010 02:24:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 02:24:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kscarr73@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.44] (HELO mail-bw0-f44.google.com) (209.85.214.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 02:24:45 +0000 Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so5546275bwz.31 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:24:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0FDSDREO5NwFENUgNWp0/Wa/CMA8BxVRGHVztr9I0Ro=; b=cMqyY/760RhsED2y4hR8AwkGU6xFkMFSvd+jRLsU6DLmKim39g8X2gYfsw5SFtXnvP z2BVldTVV3Cgmu8zYbIhny4CCiP3tRQf32L2J2P3gCprC/8HlhHdge4ZYO7VPEHdlpUh fUIqWaV8McdBIHBJKBDL8J5yR/8yBNHe4PoBQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=YGAELESszvLLviZncm08uhdChkpwTJA4E5+z7AtXipRYq+2JjDUdhJt1PtkhBVOLc8 KK51OcNwIsP6h+Pd9FGpM6QNL+yIpbyNpqfwmrJ8XIfIrd4Hlm65KLv9k7aLxCS7ZmfR jqV29dm/VKLJBzSgRNTnbzEC82yKmGmRZ1nEE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.97.137 with SMTP id l9mr473044bkn.118.1288664664497; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:24:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.64.83 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 19:24:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 21:24:24 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Adding data tag to schema From: Kevin Carr To: ddlutils-dev@db.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636498c938fe0bd0494089f79 --001636498c938fe0bd0494089f79 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Ok, scratch this. I found the data import from xml. On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Kevin Carr wrote: > I am thinking of adding a data tag to the schema. Something like: > > > > My first > widget > > Business > > > My Second > widget > > Business > > > My third > widget > > Business > > > > Indexed would tell the code that this field is the should be searched first > to see if it exists, and replaced if it does. > Auto tells the code that this field is auto generated and shouldn't be > messed with. Basically, the field is ignored when creating the update or > insert. > > Does this sound like a good idea? Am I trying to fix a problem that is > already fixed better elsewhere? > > Thanks > -- Scott Carr --001636498c938fe0bd0494089f79--