db-commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rodney Waldhoff <rwaldh...@apache.org>
Subject RE: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] db-commons-jdbp
Date Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:00:21 GMT
On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, Rodney Waldhoff wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, ROSSEL Olivier wrote:
> > I am having a look at aspect stuff, which is quite a good
> > philosophy.
> > Couldnt't your system be aspect-based?
> >
> I know next to nothing about aspects in general or aspectj in particular,
> but yes, it seems likely that many modules that use delegation logic to
> create composable, mix-in behaviors could be alternatively implemented
> using an aspect-based approach.
> This proposal is to define a group of delagating implementations of the
> JDBC interfaces.  I don't think such an implementation would benefit from
> aspects as I understand it, although many, perhaps even most of the
> applications that extend these proxies could be alternatively implemented
> using aspects.

Assuming of course, that I can:

1) compose aspects at runtime

2) apply an aspect around an arbitrary implementation of some interface
that isn't known at compile time (for the aspect)

Does anyone know if those two assumptions are correct?  Can you point me
to an example?

> - Rod <http://radio.weblogs.com/0122027/>

View raw message