datafu-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Russell Jurney <russell.jur...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Datafu graduation from the Incubator
Date Tue, 16 Aug 2016 06:27:13 GMT
+1 have thought we've been ready for months

On Monday, August 15, 2016, Matthew Hayes <matthew.terence.hayes@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 from me as well.  I reviewed the checklist and I think we satisfy almost
> all of the items listed there.
>
> I'd also like to share some data about the DataFu releases and community
> that I gathered, which might be useful documentation.
>
> Releases:
>
> 1.3.0 (2015-11-14)
> There were two release candidates, RC0 and RC1.  The release candidates
> were made available as source code.  During PPMC voting there was a minor
> bug found in a new UDF in RC0.  RC1 passed the podling dev list vote as
> well as the general incubator list vote.  Feedback provided during the
> general vote was captured in JIRAs for the next release.  Binaries were
> released later in the Apache maven repo.
>
> 1.3.1 (2016-08-09)
> There was one release candidates, RC1.  The release candidate was provided
> as source code.  Binaries were also provided for convenience in the Apache
> maven repo.  An earlier release candidate, RC0, was not voted on (I
> realized I signed with a non-Apache email and created a new RC for
> simplicity).  This release addressed all the feedback from 1.3.0.  RC1
> passed both the dev list and general list votes.  There was minor feedback,
> such as updating the copyright year range in the website, which was
> subsequently fixed with the website refresh corresponding to the release.
>
> Community:
>
> The project began with 10 committers.  Since joining incubator, another 4
> committers have been added, bringing the total number of committers to 14.
> DataFu has also received contributions from 7 other people in addition to
> those from committers.
>
> -Matt
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Sam Shah <shahsam@umich.edu
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > +1, I think we've checked most of the boxes necessary: the project and
> the
> > community is mature enough for graduation.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > looking at the awesome progress of the past couple of
> > > weeks with a 1.3.1 release out I'd like to put my mentor
> > > hat on and suggest that perhaps this community is
> > > actually ready to graduate.
> > >
> > > Now, it is true, that Datafu is a small community, but
> > > so was Celix when it graduated and it seems to be
> > > doing fine at ASF. It is OK to be small, you just have
> > > to be viable and I really think this community is.
> > >
> > > With that in mind, I'd like to open this for discussion.
> > > Lets hear what do others think.
> > >
> > > Now, personally, I find it useful to think about how ready
> > > a project is to graduation while evaluating it against this
> > > model:
> > >    https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-
> > > maturity-model.html
> > >
> > > Of course, I'm not suggesting that this is a must-follow
> > > checklist, rather just advising to keep it in mind when
> > > you for your opinion on whether Datafu is ready to leave
> > > the nest ;-)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Roman.
> > >
> >
>


-- 
Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jurney@gmail.com relato.io

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message