datafu-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Russell Jurney <russell.jur...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: apache package naming convention
Date Sat, 08 Aug 2015 03:35:33 GMT
I think we should actually file JIRAs in all the projects with org.apache
namespaces and ask them to adopt our convention.

On Friday, August 7, 2015, Sam Shah <shahsam@umich.edu> wrote:

> +1. Pig scripts are written by hand, mostly by data scientists with modest
> software skills, so asking them to change all their scripts is both painful
> and annoying with no real benefit.
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Russell Jurney <russell.jurney@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > Leave it datafu. The normal way of doing Java namespaces is terrible
> bloat,
> > and the change would be breaking.
> >
> > On Friday, August 7, 2015, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Matthew Hayes <
> > > matthew.terence.hayes@gmail.com <javascript:;> <javascript:;>>
wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Roman Shaposhnik suggested I open a discussion on the following
> topic:
> > > >
> > > > For Apache DataFu, all of the Java classes are declared in a datafu.*
> > > > namespace.  This has been the naming convention since the DataFu
> > project
> > > > started in 2010.  Since DataFu became part of the Apache incubation
> > > > process, the topic has come up of moving all of the classes into a
> > > > org.apache.datafu.* namespace.  This was first discussed in January
> > 2014
> > > > (see DATAFU-7) and most recently again in the past couple weeks.  The
> > > > consensus at the time last year was that it would be a huge pain for
> > > users
> > > > and not worth the cost.  It would break any script out there
> currently
> > > > using DataFu.  Also Jakob Homan and Russell Journey pointed out that
> > this
> > > > is just a convention and not all Apache projects follow it.  Since we
> > > would
> > > > like DataFu to graduate sometime soon it would be good to clarify
> what
> > > the
> > > > requirements are on package naming conventions before we do a
> release.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > >
> > > Current statement on Incubator website
> > >
> > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#repackaging
> > >
> > > But, if DataFu will do the repackaging, better sooner (before
> graduation)
> > > then later.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jurney@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>
> > datasyndrome.com
> >
>


-- 
Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jurney@gmail.com datasyndrome.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message