Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396FD200B54 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:52:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 381F4160A85; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:52:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 76574160A56 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:52:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 64488 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2016 15:52:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 64476 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2016 15:52:07 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:52:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 79BFF18964C for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:52:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.486 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.486 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nmRDcSoZzXdw for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mbob.nabble.com (mbob.nabble.com [162.253.133.15]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 741905F1F5 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:52:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from msam.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.85]) by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8452D7C8FD for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 08:27:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 08:52:03 -0700 (MST) From: dom To: users@cxf.apache.org Message-ID: <1469721123936-5770863.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1469627005531-5770837.post@n5.nabble.com> <1469627252381-5770841.post@n5.nabble.com> <1469695440224-5770853.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Using RSA with SHA256 algorithm for WS-Security policy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:52:10 -0000 Thank you so much !! That was it ! This covers my needs ! I suppose the counter part of this configuration is that you can only accept one kind of digest method's. So if you have several client partner's they must agree on the algorithm to use. Thanks again, Regards, -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Using-RSA-with-SHA256-algorithm-for-WS-Security-policy-tp5766680p5770863.html Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.